• Entrepreneurial Equity
  • Portfolio Investments
    • Current Investments
    • Historic Investments
  • Scribblings
    • Jane Taylor Book Launch
  • Fake News
  • Theology, Religion & Philosophy Corner
    • Does God Exist? The Rational Approach
    • What is the Evidence for Christianity?
    • What did Jesus Actually Teach? Only in His own Words
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Contact
  • Media Gallery
  • About Me
  • Home
  • Entrepreneurial Equity
  • Portfolio Investments
    • Current Investments
    • Historic Investments
  • Scribblings
    • Jane Taylor Book Launch
  • Fake News
  • Theology, Religion & Philosophy Corner
    • Does God Exist? The Rational Approach
    • What is the Evidence for Christianity?
    • What did Jesus Actually Teach? Only in His own Words

Those Dishonest Goldsmiths

Those Dishonest Goldsmiths

06 Jan 2011
0 Comment
Toby Baxendale
Economics

My second beach reading has been the above named article. Like the last one I reviewed, this is written by one of the giants of the Austrian School, Prof George Selgin.

You can download this paper in draft here.

For anyone interested in the origins of modern banking, this paper should definitely be consulted.

Prof Selgin challenges the conventional wisdom that the acts of some goldsmiths as they took in gold for safe keeping and issued out more claims, or promises, to redeem gold than there was gold in their vaults, was fraudulent.

In a good bit of historical detective work, the Professor has dug up new references that would seem to show some of the following points, which may surprise some readers:

  1. Goldsmiths paid interest, so this implied that people knew that they were not engaging in an act of safekeeping, but were indeed entering into lending (client / depositor) and borrowing (the goldsmith / banker).
  2. The use of the word deposit was used to describe a deposit for safekeeping and a deposit for lending.
  3. There was case law well before Carr v Carr in 1811 that clearly established that if you deposited in a sealed bag, your money would be yours and stored for safekeeping only. If it was deposited loose, it would indeed be a act of lending, by the depositor, to the goldsmith.
  4. When I last read the case notes of Carr v Carr I do seem to remember that the bag was indeed sealed and earmarked, but the judge found that it was still a bank debt obligation as opposed to a safekeeping arrangement. Not being able to check sources from the beach, I would not say for certain that his was the case, however, I believe it was contra Selgin.
  5. The goldsmiths rejected the establishment of a state sponsored Bank of England. There was a smear campaign against goldsmiths to discredit them.
  6. The real angst against the Goldsmiths was that (i) they exported heavier and finer coin for export where it would fetch a better price and leaving the less valuable coin for the local population and (ii) they were usurious in the way they charged interest.
  7. After King Charles I’s theft of money deposited form safe keeping in the Mint, merchants placed money in the hands of corrupt servants who them embezzled funds with the knowing and or unknowing collaboration of some goldsmiths.

Other economists such as Jesus Heurta De Soto in his book, Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles, may well dispute this history as he has documented many counterexamples to support the usual notion that goldsmiths over-issued promissory notes to specie deposited.

Anyway, does it matter to us today what happened in our history concerning this disputed issue?

I say yes it does.

Selgin’s work clearly shows us that there was confusion between the use of the term deposit. Some used it clearly to mean safekeeping and some lending. To me this begs the question, should banking be about a fiduciary arrangement of trust between parties, an enduring obligation of safekeeping and careful investment, or should it be about a straight forward commercial investment with risk to get reward?

This today is still not clear for most depositors. Take the example of the Cobden Centre’s commission of a survey of 2,000 people. Here the majority think they own the money deposited and want to have safe and easy access. Most are confused that to have interest this means they have to lend it to bankers to invest, implying risk and reward. Confusion still reigns supreme in matters of banking.

For my part, as Carswell and Baker have said in Parliament, we can help clear up this multi century confusion by defining a deposit for custody and deposit for lending. One is a enduring relationship of trust, the other a commercial relationship of profit and loss.

I hold also, that with regards to bankers offering fractional reserve accounts, this is possible if the following is adhered to:

  1. Both parties know this is happening (i.e. the contract explicitly explains this),
  2. The bank receives the deposited money and makes you a timed depositor from an accounting perspective, for an agreed time period, thus making sure there is no maturity mismatch and no grant of legal privilege required to keep the bank solvent (i.e. it is forced to account like any other commercial entity).
  3. The depositor is offered “instant access” by exception only via the bank making available for redemption only the cash it has on hand and in its own equity funds. If a panic / run occurs, it can enforce a no redemption policy until the time deposit expires.

This way, you can begin to see a way of squaring the circle: having banks with full reserves, that a run could not be made against, that could not over issue bank credit, but only lend real timed savings, but would also allow a solvent “fractional reserve” type of account.

Fiduciary and trust would be the bywords for the safekeeping and investment for the lending and paying of interest.

Selgin’s work is a very interesting revisionist historical account of the foundation of modern banking and should be read by all interested in the subject area. The questions that arise from it are touched upon here by me. I urge you all to read if you have time as it may stimulate more and other thought processes.

About the Author
“Toby Baxendale is an entrepreneur who built up, amongst other things, the UK's largest fresh fish supplier to the Food Service sector, see www.directseafoods.co.uk, and recently sold it. Toby is dedicated to furthering the teaching of the Austrian school of economics. He established and funded the 1st Distinguished Hayek Visiting Teaching Fellowship Program at the LSE in Honour of the Nobel Laureate F A Hayek. Toby is Chairman of The Cobden Centre. Richard Cobden's timeless principles of the abolition of legal privilege of the few at the expense of the many are worthy in this day and age to promote.

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

More Scribblings

Japan, an Opportunity Awaits Us

11 Jun 2020

Austrian Economics Podcast

22 Oct 2019

Economics for the Many

18 Oct 2018

What is Right Wing?

06 Nov 2017

The Protectionist Zombie Is Back

19 Jul 2017

Brexit Podcast

16 Jun 2017

Liberty Me

20 Dec 2013

My Time for Speakers for Schools

07 Dec 2013

The Selfish Gene, its Extended Phenotypic Effects and Human Cooperation

19 Aug 2013

In Defense of the Euro (An Austrian Perspective)

15 Aug 2013

IM70.3 Mallorca - The Chairman's report

13 May 2013

AEP and “The Chicago Plan Revisited

18 Jan 2013

Ron Paul’s Monetary Policy Anthology

08 Jan 2013

Exorcising the Ghost of Ironman Zurich

14 Nov 2012

Communist Approval For Western Central Banking

28 Sep 2012

The Motive Powers Of Destructionism

19 Sep 2012

The Hope Of Osborne And The Error Of Osborne

14 Sep 2012

The Ultimate Subsidy For The Rich

03 Sep 2012

Gross And Net Product

30 Aug 2012

Did The Savings Glut Or Massive Monetary Epansion Cause The Boom And The Bust?

13 Aug 2012

Forward To Liberalism

29 Jul 2012

Hugh Hendry v. Joseph Stiglitz

18 Jul 2012

Fraud - Documentary

13 Jul 2012

A Great Teacher

13 Jul 2012

Fraud

13 Jul 2012

Our Central Bankers Are intellectually Bankrupt

09 May 2012

Tag Cloud

Austrian School Bank of England Banking Benjamin M. Anderson Economics F A Hayek Fractional Reserve Banking Fraud gold Hayek Hayek Lecture 2010 Henry Hazlitt Honest Money Huerta de Soto inflation Insight Jean Baptiste Say Ken Schoolland Keynes Keynesianism MIses Monetarism Quantitative Easing Richard Cobden Sean Corrigan
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Proudly built by Lemongrass Media - Web Design Hertfordshire